logo

e-Therapeutics - Capital Network: Undervalued Stock with a Unique Approach to Drug Discovery

Written by Riccardo Lowi

e-Therapeutics is an Undervalued Stock with a Unique Approach to Drug Discovery

  KEY INVESTOR MESSAGES 

  1. e-Therapeutics (LON:ETX) focuses on the discovery of  new drugs in a more efficient and effective way and aims to be a valued partner to address the productivity challenge that the pharma industry faces.
  2. e-Therapeutics (LON:ETX) has developed a novel and unique in-silico approach to drug discovery: starting from the analysis of complex interactions between proteins in biological systems (networks), they apply advanced computational techniques to identify new drug candidates.
  3. This approach was labeled Network-driven Drug Discovery (NDD) and has been validated across several therapeutic areas (cancer, central nervous system, auto-immunity, infectious diseases) and molecular pathways.
  4. e-Therapeutics (LON:ETX) discovery platform has generated three drug candidates for multiple cancer indications which are ready to be out-licensed to pharma partners for their further development.
  5. We estimate e-Therapeutics intrinsic value to be roughly 3x higher than current market capitalisation. The latter doesn't reflect the commercial potential of e-Therapeutics' most advanced drug candidates and of the platform itself.
  6. e-Therapeutics ability to finalise a co-development or licensing agreement in the near term will represent a key inflection point for its stock re-rating.

A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND R&D PRODUCTIVITY

e-Therapeutics addresses in a unique and differentiated way a well known and pressing problem in the quest for new drugs: the very high failure rate of new drug candidates during their decade-long development path, despite the huge investments made in time and dollar terms.

Essentially new drugs are brought to patients through a lengthy (10-15 years) and costly (from hundreds of million to over a billion dollar) process, which hasn't changed that much over last few decades.

 

Moreover, medicines for the most obvious "druggable" targets have already been produced, making the development of incrementally beneficial drugs increasingly hard.  

We also note that payers are increasingly asking for clinical trials that show a clear benefit compared to available therapies (outcome-based reimbursement), raising the bar for the commercialization of new drugs, or at least limiting the addressable patients population. 

As such returns on every dollar invested in R&D have been steadily declining, despite favourable demographic trends and pricing environment, at least in the US.

To simplify, the approval of a new medicine requires four sequential phases: discovery, pre-clinical development, in-human clinical trials (clinical stage development), and regulatory review.

What mostly hurts returns on R&D investments is the last part of the development process, i.e. the large phase 3 trials that regulators require in order to give green light to a new drug. Although each phase 3 trial enrolment size depends on the therapeutic indication and other factors, these late-stage clinical studies tend to include large patient populations and end up representing around 80-90% of the total drug development cost. In fact they are designed to be the last barrier before a drug can be widely prescribed to the public, as such they are powered to detect drugs' efficacy and safety with a much higher sensitivity than earlier stage phase 1 and phase 2 clinical trials.

Although from a patient's perspective it is a good sign that many drugs fail in the late stages of development (i.e. useless or dangerous drugs never reach the market), this represents an enormous problem for pharmaceutical companies and biotech investors in general.

As shown in Figure 4, only 10% of drugs that enter the in-human development stage, ultimately end up receiving a regulatory approval.

The highest attrition rate usually occurs in phase 2, when new drug candidates are required for the first time to show a proof of clinical efficacy (proof-of-concept data).

It should also be noted that the statistics shown above include clinical trials for both new drugs and for additional indications of already approved drugs: the actual probability of success of truly innovative, first-in-class, new molecules are likely to be significantly lower than the averages described above.
 
As we briefly discussed, the costs of bringing a new drug to the market are rising fast, and the revenue generated by these new drugs tend, on average, to be lower than in the past.

This leads to the need of new solutions to address the decreasing returns on R&D investments, and here is where new drug discovery methodologies come into play.

A new approach that could help addressing R&D attrition is represented by the application of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to the earlier stages of the drug development, i.e. to the discovery phase.
 
It's hard to describe briefly what AI is, but in essence it can be defined as a software-on-steroids that can learn to do things, without being explicitly programmed to do them.  This usually happens after a "trial" period where the system has been properly trained to do so. As an example, AI can be used to recognize images of animals when fed with a larger dataset of random images. For the readers who wish to dig deeper into AI and its branches, amongst the multiplicity of freely available sources we would recommend the following as an introduction. 
 
AI-driven drug design represents the application of machine learning techniques to drug discovery, with the aim of speeding up and make more efficient the whole process of developing new medicines.
The discovery phase is the first stage of drug development: it is meant to produce "lead candidates", or molecules ready to be tested in pre-clinical in-vitro and in-vivo models.
 
The discovery phase can be broken down in two parts: i) the generation of "hits", or molecules with an acceptable level of the desired activity, via an initial screening process and ii) the optimization of "hits" into "leads" or drug candidates with a sufficient level of biological activity, pharmacokinetic and safety properties in order to be progressed to the pre-clinical development stage.
 
In traditional drug discovery hits generation is done through in vitro assays of large compound libraries. The subsequent lead optimization happens through sequential DMTA (Design-Make-Test-Analyze) cycles.
 
In vitro assay can typically screen libraries of 106 molecules and take about a year to set-up whereas in silico screening ramps up to 1013 compounds. To put this into perspective the whole druggable chemical space is estimated to be in the 1063 order of magnitude.

A recent paper on drug discovery [Andrew M. Davis et al., Directing evolution: the next revolution in drug discovery, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2017] estimates the duration of the discovery phase at about 4-5 years for a US$ 14-25mil cost. Furthermore they estimate an attrition rate for the discovery phase at 50% or higher and then up to 97% from lead candidate to the launch of a new drug in the market.
 
We finally note that Vasant Narasimhan, the recently appointed CEO of Novartis, has declared that the increased use of digital technology (data analytics and AI) could lead to a 10-25% reduction of drug development costs.

E-THERAPEUTICS’ NETWORK-DRIVEN DRUG DISCOVERY (NDD)

e-Therapeutics has developed its own differentiated approach to drug discovery.
 
The company has created a unique and powerful computer-based drug discovery platform and uses a specialised approach to network biology.
Their main claim is that novel network-driven drug discovery methodology allows them to discover new and better drugs in a more efficient and effective way.
 
Their discovery process (represented in the figure below) is based, first, on a fundamental understanding of the biological basis of disease which e-therapeutics are able represent as a collection of complex protein networks.  Their approach is driven using very comprehensive datasets, including all know protein-protein interactions, multi-omic data, patient tissue sample data and compound-protein bioactivity footprints.
 
The NDD approach has been enabled by recent advancements in big biological data, network science, computational power, advanced analytical methods and techniques such as machine learning and AI.
 
e-Therapeutics then uses a variety of sophisticated and often proprietary computational techniques to identify and analyse which protein sets to target  to optimally perturb the diseased state. In-silico screening (compound mapping) of millions of compounds leads to the selection of compounds with bioactivity signatures close to the optimal pattern that should interact with the disease networks and restore their physiological status.  e-therapeutics then takes the identified compounds and tests them in disease-relevant cell or tissue- based phenotypic assays.  The proportion of compounds that have activity at levels of <10 micromolar is highly impressive and several orders of magnitude higher than high throughput techniques.  Another advantage is that the NDD approach can identify several different chemotypes to drive subsequent medicinal chemistry. 
 
Another key advantage is that because e-therapeutics interrogates biology in a fundamentally different way they have been able to discover drugs with novel mechanism of action, which can lead to first-in-class drugs which may have advantages in the clinic.
 
 
In traditional pharma discovery, this process ("hits" generation) is usually done through in-vitro screening of large libraries and takes several years. e-Therapeutics digital approach was able to reduce the time required to generate new hits to about 9 months or less.

Finally, the lead optimization phase proceeds through Design-Make-Test-Analyze (DMTA) cycles, as in traditional drug discovery.

E-THERAPEUTICS KEY ASSETS

e-Therapeutics NDD platform has led to the identification of several promising programs over the last few years.

Following a recent strategic review meant to assess each molecule potential, and taking into account currently available resources for their further development, the company has decided to focus on three key candidates, described in the table below.

Out of those three assets, based on current research and deal-making trends, we are of the view that the checkpoint modulation program is the one with the highest commercial attractiveness.

COMPETITION

As diminishing R&D productivity represents a pressing issue in the bio-pharma industry, new drug discovery methodologies are certainly a hot and highly competitive area.
 
Given the breadth of the problem, we would not expect that a single company would dominate this space. On the contrary, we believe that several different approaches may lead to successful drug discovery across therapeutic areas.
 
One such area is the application of AI to drug discovery. However it should be noted that e-therapeutics use AI as a tool in their suite of technologies rather than as the fundamental technology itself.

What really matters for companies such as e-Therapeutics is to have a well defined and differentiated approach compared to their competitors. On this respect we note for many players AI/machine learning represents the starting point and core of their platform, whereas e-Therapeutics puts a strong emphasis on the deep comprehension of biologic systems (networks). This in turn represents the starting point for the application of AI techniques for the identification of drug candidates that could fix "broken" protein networks responsible for the development of diseases.

VALUATION

We are not aware of any straightforward, widely accepted methodology to value an innovative drug discovery platform; and whilst there aren't truly comparable companies publicly trading on a stock market, valuations of VC-backed private companies are hard to come by.
 
Anecdotally, we note that BenevolentAI, a UK-based AI healthcare company, was reported to have raised US$100mln at a valuation of US$1.78bn, although this occurred after they had licensed out two drug candidates for Alzheimer’s to an unnamed pharma company with a deal valued up to $800mln.
 
Earlier this year Exscientia, another UK-based, AI-driven drug discovery company, signed a collaboration agreement with Sanofi, a French big pharma, worth EUR250 million. Then more recently Evotec, a German pharma CRO, acquired a minority stake in Exscientia via a EUR15 million investment.
 
Other in-silico drug discovery companies have raised amounts in the US$4-50mln range from Venture Capital investors.
 
Two important factors appear to affect the valuation of AI-driven discovery platforms: i) the development stage reached by the drugs they have produced and ii) the finalization of a licensing deal with a global pharma company that bought into their technology.
 
In this respect, e-Therapeutics appears to be in a peculiar situation. As a listed company, it is subject to market forces, i.e. its market capitalization is also dependent on market factors (liquidity, risk appetite, institutional investors' mandates etc.), unrelated to the merits of its technology.
 
Furthermore, up to now, e-Therapeutics has not yet signed any collaboration with a larger pharma company and its leading projects are still completing the discovery phase.

As such we believe that the most appropriate way to estimate E-Therapeutics intrinsic value is to break it down into several components:

  1. The three most advanced discovery projects (hedgehog, tryptophan, checkpoint)
  2. The proprietary network-driven discovery platform
  3. Cash on hand
  4. R&D tax credits

Discovery projects

We have built a simplified model to estimate the present value of a hypothetical licensing deal worth £250mln, with a £25mln upfront payment and the balance in milestones payments spread over a 20-year period.
 
Future milestones have been risk-adjusted and discounted using a 15% discount rate, which we believe to be in line with industry standards for this kind of projects.
 
Should e-Therapeutics sign a deal of this kind within the next 12 month, we estimate it would be worth £67mln (present value).
 
However, as it is still far from certain that such deal will be finalized in the near term, we show in the table below the present value of this hypothetical deal, adjusted for different probabilities of this deal actually happening.

Given the relative commercial attractiveness of the checkpoints, tryptophan and hedgehog projects we used these assumptions to value these assets. That is of course equivalent to say that we estimate a 40%, 30%, and 20% probability that a deal for each one of these three programs will occur in the near future.

Network-driven Discovery Platform

Whilst it is hard to attribute a precise a value to an early stage drug discovery platform as e-Therapeutics NDD, it is undeniable that such a unique, proprietary platform has a significant value.

Still using as a base our theoretical deal illustrated above, assuming that e-Therapeutics will be able to generate two lead candidates per year in calendar 2019, 2020 and 2021, this would equate to a cumulative present value of about £50mln. This represents the value we currently attribute to e-Therapeutics discovery platform.

Cash on hand

Based on a net cash position of £12.4 million at the end of July, we estimate a cash position of approx. £11mln at the end of October 2017.

R&D tax credit

Based on our forecast for R&D expenses in fiscal year to January 2018, e-Therapeutics would be entitled to a £1.5mln cash reimbursement in fiscal year 2019.

Dilution discount

Given e-Therapeutics cash runaway, we acknowledge that investors may factor in a discount to reflect the fact that a dilutive fundraising in the medium term can't be ruled out. As such we apply our SOTP valuation at a 30% discount, which we believe adequately reflects the risk of a dilutive capital increase taking place in the next couple of years. 
 
As shown below, our valuation methodology yields an intrinsic value approx. 3x higher than current market capitalisation, despite our conservative assumptions.

KEY FINANCIALS

Our model doesn't include any recurrent or non-recurrent income from potential licensing agreements that e-Therapeutics may sign over the coming months or years.
 
We focus on the ongoing operating expenses necessary to support the generation of further drug candidates, which we expect to be in the £7-8 million range in the next few years.
 
Our cash flow projection also take into account that the company receives cash tax credits worth approx. 1/3 of their R&D expenses.
 
As such, based on our forecast, e-Therapeutics has sufficient funds to support their ongoing discovery activities into the first half of calendar year 2019 (fiscal year ending Jan. 2020).

 

 

LEGAL NOTICE – IMPORTANT – PLEASE READ:

Proactive Research is a trading name of Proactive Investors Limited which is regulated and authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) under firm registration number 559082. This document is published by Proactive Research and its contents have not been approved as a financial promotion by Proactive Investors Limited or any other FCA authorised person. This communication is made on the basis of the 'journalist exemption' provide for in Article 20 of The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 and having regard to the FCA Rules, and in particular PERG 8.12.

This communication has been commissioned and paid for by e-Therapeutics plc and prepared and issued by Proactive Research for publication. All information used in the preparation of this communication has been compiled from publicly available sources that we believe to be reliable, however, we cannot, and do not, guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this communication.

The information and opinions expressed in this communication were produced by Proactive Research as at the date of writing and are subject to change without notice. This communication is intended for information purposes only and does not constitute an offer, recommendation, solicitation, inducement or an invitation by, or on behalf of, Proactive Research to make any investments whatsoever. Opinions of and commentary by the authors reflect their current views, but not necessarily of other affiliates of Proactive Research or any other third party. Services and/or products mentioned in this communication may not be suitable for all recipients and may not be available in all countries.

This communication has been prepared without taking account of the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular investor. Before entering into any transaction, investors should consider the suitability of the transaction to their individual circumstance and objectives. Any investment or other decision should only be made by an investor after a thorough reading of the relevant product term sheet, subscription agreement, information memorandum, prospectus or other offering document relating to the issue of securities or other financial instruments.

Nothing in this communication constitutes investment, legal accounting or tax advice, or a representation that any investment or strategy is suitable or appropriate for individual circumstances or otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation for any specific investor. Proactive Research recommends that investors independently assess with an appropriately qualified professional adviser, the specific financial risks as well as legal, regulatory, credit, tax and accounting consequences.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Performance forecasts are not a reliable indicator of future performance. The investor may not get back the amount invested or may be required to pay more.

Although the information and date in this communication are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, no representation is made that such information is accurate or complete. Proactive Research, its affiliates and subsidiaries do not accept liability for loss arising from the use of this communication. This communication is not directed to any person in any jurisdiction where, by reason of that person's nationality, residence or otherwise, such communications are prohibited.

This communication may contain information obtained from third parties, including ratings from rating agencies such as Standard & Poor's, Moody's, Fitch and other similar rating agencies. Reproduction and distribution of third-party content in any form is prohibited except with the prior written consent of the related third-party. Credit ratings are statements of opinion and are not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold or sell securities. Such credit ratings do not address the market value of securities or the suitability of securities for investment purposes, and should not be relied upon as investment advice.

Persons dealing with Proactive Research or members of the Proactive Investors Limited group outside the UK are not covered by the rules and regulations made for the protection of investors in the UK.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, where this communication constitutes a financial promotion issued in the UK that is not exempt under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 or the Orders made thereunder or the rules of the FCA, it is issued or approved for distribution in the UK by Proactive Investors Limited.

Latest Research